Data School




  • Gerards, Janneke, Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Iris Muis, Arthur Vankan. 2021. Fundamental Rights & Algorithms Impact Assessment (FRAIA). Government of the Netherlands. Rijksoverheid.
  • Siffels, Lotje, David van den Berg, Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Iris Muis. 2022. Public Values and Technological Change: Mapping how municipalities grapple with data ethics. In Hepp, Andreas, Juliane Jarke, Leif Kramp (eds). New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies. The Ambivalences of Data Power. Palgrave,
  • Veerbeek, Joris, Jeroen Bakker, Sahra Mohamed, Meilina Reksoprodjo, Tom Stienen, Mirko Tobias Schäfer. 2022. Online antisemitisme in 2020 [Online antisemitism]. Research report, Utrecht University.
  • Veerbeek, Joris, Karin van Es, and Eggo Müller. “Public Broadcasting and Topic Diversity in the Netherlands: Mentions of Public Broadcasters’ Programming in Newspapers as Indicators of Pluralism.” Javnost-The Public 29.4 (2022): 420-438.


Wetenschappelijke publicaties 

  • Bakker, J., Cornelisse, D., Mohammed, S., Schaefer, M., & Veerbeek, J. (2021). Van scherm naar straat: Hoe sociale media-conversaties protest op straat mobiliseren. Utrecht University. 
  • van den Berg, D., de Graaf, L., & Schäfer, M. (2021). Expert opinion: Considering the ethical issues of invasive technologies Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA) & CoronaMelder. In Conditions for technological solutions in a COVID-19 exit strategy, with particular focus on the legal and societal conditions: Report for ZonMw (pp. 104-110). University of Amsterdam.  
  • van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. (2021). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media and Society. 
  • Franzke, A., Muis, I. M., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology.
  • Radstok, W., Chekol, M., & Schäfer, M. (2021). Are knowledge graph embedding models biased, or is it the data that they are trained on?. Paper presented at Wikidata Workshop 2021 co-located with the 20th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2021). 
  • Schäfer, Mirko Tobias; Clausen, Nelly (2021): Participatory Data Ethics. Mensch und Computer 2021 – Workshopband. DOI: 10.18420/muc2021-mci-ws06-316.
  • Veerbeek, J., van Es, K. F., & Müller, E. (2021). Professional follow-up communication as an indicator of public value: Analyzing Dutch PSB’s role in societal debates through topic modelling of press coverage. Journal of Mass Communication Inquiry, 1. 



Wetenschappelijke publicaties 

  • van Geenen, D., & Wieringa, M. A. (2020). Approaching data visualizations as interfaces: An empirical demonstration of how data are imag(in)ed. In M. Engebretsen, & H. Kennedy (Eds.), Data Visualization in Society (pp. 141-156). Amsterdam University Press. 
  • Wieringa, M. A. (2020). What to account for when accounting for algorithms: A systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability. In M. Hildebrandt, & C. Castillo (Eds.), FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1-18). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).  
  • van Es, K. F., & Poell, T. (2020). Platform Imaginaries and Dutch Public Service Media. Social Media + Society, 6(2). 
  • Veerbeek, J., van Es, K. F., & Müller, E. (2020). Public broadcasting and topic diversity in The Netherlands: Mentions of public broadcasters’ programming in newspapers as indicators of pluriformity. Manuscript submitted for publication. 
  • van Es, K. F., & de Lange, M. L. (2020). Data with its boots on the ground: Datawalking as research method. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 278-289. 
  • Masson, E., & van Es, K. F. (2020). Rain on Your Radar: Engaging in Weather Data as Part of Everyday Routines. In N. M. Engebretsen, & H. Kennedy (Eds.), Data Visualization in Society (pp. 77-94). Amsterdam University Press. 
  • Masson, E., van Es, K. F., & Wieringa, M. A. (2020). Data Walking for Critical Data Studies: An Explorative Survey of Walking Methodologies. Digital Culture & Education, 11(1), 36-52.  
  • van Es, K. F. (2020). YouTube’s Operational Logic: “The View” as Pervasive Category. Television and New Media, 21(3), 223-239. 


  • Schäfer, M. T., Boiten, M. J., Veerbeek, J., Prins, S., Krijgsman, M., Hopstaken, M., Muis, R., & Mullaart, P. (2020). Online bedreigingen in het lokaal bestuur. (Cahier; Vol. 2020, No. 15). Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC), Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie. 


Wetenschappelijke publicaties 


Heeft u vragen of opmerkingen? Laat het ons weten! Contact NL

Feedback form